Search
Close this search box.

Medvedev Asserts Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine as a Firm Reality, Not Just a Hint

Moscow: Deputy Head of Russia's Security Council Dmitry Medvedev has emphasized that the country's nuclear doctrine is not merely suggestive, asserting that Russia possesses the right to respond to threats against its sovereignty. In a candid discussion, Medvedev outlined the conditions under which nuclear weapons might be used, based on Russia's established policies.

According to Anadolu Agency, Medvedev clarified in an interview with Vedomosti newspaper that Russia's nuclear stance is rooted in practicality rather than intimidation. He highlighted that the doctrine allows for the use of nuclear weapons if Russia's security is severely compromised. Dismissing the idea that Russia's nuclear rhetoric is simply a hint, Medvedev stressed the doctrine's importance in safeguarding national security.

The former Russian president and prime minister elaborated on recent updates to the nuclear document, which now includes a broader range of military threats. He emphasized that aggression against Russia or Belarus, especially involving a nuclear power, would be treated as a joint assault on both nations. Medvedev reiterated that any critical threat to sovereignty warrants a response, with the final decision resting with Russia's head of state.

Medvedev also accused Western nations of escalating global tensions towards a potential nuclear crisis, citing aggressive actions like strikes on Russian cities as possible precursors to World War III. He warned that Russia's military might could target strategic locations, including the Ukrainian capital and NATO sites, cautioning against the irreversible consequences of such actions.

While acknowledging the catastrophic potential of nuclear warfare, Medvedev affirmed Russia's commitment to preventing a global disaster. He emphasized that nuclear engagement remains a last resort, to be considered only when all other options have been exhausted. He concluded by noting the precariousness of the current global situation, comparing it to the ticking of the Doomsday Clock, with humanity teetering on the edge of a significant crisis.